Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Originally published in Science Express on 5 November 2009
Science 13 November 2009:
Vol. 326. no. 5955, pp. 940 - 941
DOI: 10.1126/science.1176958

Policy Forum

Climate Change:

Bridging the Montreal-Kyoto Gap

Jeff Cohen,1,* Alex Rau,2 Kristian Brüning2

Because of the growing need for near-term, feasible, greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement options (1), there is increasing interest in the scale and cost-effectiveness of potential emission reductions from destruction of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) (2). Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ODSs not only damage stratospheric ozone, but also are powerful GHGs, with global warming potentials (GWPs) up to 11,000 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) (3). The Montreal Protocol eliminates production of these chemicals but does not control their emissions or require destruction of ODSs produced before phaseout deadlines. The Kyoto Protocol targets emissions of CO2 and other non-ODS GHGs. Because of these regulatory gaps, large quantities of ODSs remain in legal use or storage in older refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment, building and appliance insulation, fire suppression systems, and government and industrial stockpiles (4). Without requirements or incentives for destruction, these ODSs will ultimately be released to the atmosphere and contribute to anthropogenic climate change.

1 EOS Climate, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
2 Climate Wedge Ltd., San Francisco, CA 94080, and 00120 Helsinki, Finland.

* Author for correspondence. E-mail: jcohen{at}eosclimate

Read the Full Text





To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)