Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 24 February 2006:
Vol. 311. no. 5764, p. 1087
DOI: 10.1126/science.311.5764.1087b

ScienceScope

With the Bush Administration keeping the federal government on the sidelines, other groups are jumping into the breach to set policies on the use of embryonic stem cells in research. On 27 February, a trial in Alameda County Superior Court was scheduled to address whether the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) violates the state constitution. CIRM is expected to prevail, but the inevitable appeals are likely to take at least a year, delaying the sale of bonds to raise the $3 billion specified in the state initiative passed in November 2004.

Meanwhile, on 10 February, CIRM's governing board adopted policies regulating egg acquisition and intellectual property that will eventually become state law. "We are becoming a surrogate for the U.S. in stem cell research," says institute president Zach Hall. Likewise, the National Academies has announced that it will form a permanent panel to offer up-to-date guidance to stem cell researchers. Funding from private sources will help it apply guidelines proposed in an April 2005 report.






To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)