Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 10 March 2006:
Vol. 311. no. 5766, p. 1347
DOI: 10.1126/science.311.5766.1347a

Editors' Choice: Highlights of the recent literature

It might seem that nowadays we're already drowning in too much data and that devoting more energy to interpreting it and less to collecting even more of it would be advisable. On the other hand, large amounts of data can offer the opportunity of looking at old questions in new ways.

Nordhaus describes the construction of a geographically scaled economic data set (G-Econ) that transforms the economic quantity gross regional product (where a region can be a nation, as in gross national product, or a smaller political subdivision) along geophysical dimensions, such as temperature or coastal proximity. Aggregating economic data across multiple sources and scaling output to a cell size of 1° longitude by 1° latitude yields the gross cell product or GCP. The established finding that output per person increases with distance from the equator converts into a decrease in output per area as mean temperature decreases, with a decline of 105 from the maximum at about 10°C to the polar regions. Further analysis reveals that country-specific effects, such as institutional differences, account for only one-third of this variation, with geography contributing to but not explaining all of the rest. -- GJC

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 10.1073/pnas.0509842103 (2006).






To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)