Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.


Science 24 December 2004:
Vol. 306. no. 5705, p. 2165
DOI: 10.1126/science.306.5705.2165c

Editors' Choice: Highlights of the recent literature

Fossil and molecular evidence have hitherto suggested that the cercopithecoids (Old-World monkeys) and hominoid (ape and human) lineages diverged around the Oligocene/ Miocene boundary, 23 to 25 million years ago (Ma). In a challenge to the recentness of this estimate, Steiper et al. adopt a molecular approach called quartet analysis, which uses sequence data from two pairs of species from two clades to assess divergence dates with greater precision. For the hominoid branch, chimpanzee and human were chosen, and for the cercopithecoids, baboon and macaque; the divergence dates between the members of each pair were calibrated from fossil data. The resulting model suggests that the hominoid/cercopithecoid divergence took place in the Early Oligocene, 29 to 34.5 Ma. The implication of this result is that several million years of early hominoid history have yet to be sampled paleontologically and that Proconsul--hitherto considered the earliest of all hominoids--may have had earlier hominoid ancestors. -- AMS

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 17021 (2004).






To Advertise     Find Products


Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)